kill
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by kill on Oct 4, 2008 6:01:56 GMT -5
...That's right folks. Me and Xaphan (middle tiers) just defeated Thor and Mighty, the only "Top Tiers" on Classic for the GCS Tag Team titles.
Stuff that in your tier list Gladius. Just proved that tier lists are rubbish/inaccurate/null.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Oct 4, 2008 8:05:33 GMT -5
I wouldn't rush to conclusions over this one victory, the 2 rounds you won were by 1 heart, could easily have gone the other way, whereas the one you lost you got dominated with me and Mighty still having a total of 6 hearts remaining together.
|
|
kill
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by kill on Oct 4, 2008 9:24:14 GMT -5
Errrm, if you and Mighty are so good, why did you lose 2 rounds? besides, the only 1 round that we lost we did give in, so no point providing fake HP information. It's about winning overall, no one will remember that you won 1 round, they will however, remember that you guys lost 2 rounds resulting in us winning the titles.
The point of the thread was not to show who is better or whatnot; but to show that tier lists are inaccurate/null.
|
|
|
Post by gladius on Oct 4, 2008 9:46:12 GMT -5
Um...kill.
I'm 90% sure the thread was titled CTF Tier List, not sparring tier list.
It's true, you guys won the belts. But thor is correct about the HP. Kill won round 1 with 1 hp left. Thor/mighty won round 2 with 6 hp left. Xaphan won round 3 with 1 hp left against thor.
Just because a team wins 6-5 in a ctf game doesn't mean they're uberrificially better than the other team. It probably means the winning team caught a break or two.
|
|
kill
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by kill on Oct 4, 2008 12:23:44 GMT -5
you just can't accept the fact tier lists aren't accurate.
|
|
|
Post by gladius on Oct 4, 2008 12:29:58 GMT -5
You can't just use something in a way it wasn't intended for.
|
|
kill
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by kill on Oct 4, 2008 19:25:35 GMT -5
Just did.
|
|
|
Post by gladius on Oct 4, 2008 19:26:45 GMT -5
Then you are mistaken comrade.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Oct 4, 2008 23:58:33 GMT -5
I remember a certain small team in White from South West London claiming a victory over a certain big team in Red from North London several weeks back. The White team played well, but not excellently, they got their noses infront with a little luck and managed to hold on for the win, the Red team you can say had an off day, dominated periods of the game but it just wasn't enough on this occasion, does that mean that the certain team in White from South West London are better than the certain team in Red from North London?
|
|
|
Post by gladius on Oct 5, 2008 9:03:47 GMT -5
For the one game, yes.
But if you play that game over and over....well I don't know since I know little about what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Post by MysticX2X on Oct 5, 2008 9:43:53 GMT -5
poo hd anyways.
|
|
|
Post by aerox on Oct 5, 2008 18:50:23 GMT -5
Tier lists are based on overall prestige(presentation) 1 victory doesnt automatically change it. People like kill and xaphan are way to unstable when it comes to wins. Where Thor and Mighty are overall winners.
Imo tiers are based on overall prestige and not one day flies.
|
|
|
Post by Yump on Oct 5, 2008 19:01:10 GMT -5
lol @ calling ctf tier lists sparring tier lists
if that's how it worked i would be bottom tier w/ jade
|
|
|
Post by gladius on Oct 5, 2008 19:45:18 GMT -5
Oh my.
BTW yump when you getting unbanned?
|
|
|
Post by Gemini on Oct 6, 2008 6:28:48 GMT -5
make a sparring tier list
|
|