|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 11:54:57 GMT -5
Post by gladius on Mar 8, 2009 11:54:57 GMT -5
Thor has a point. If you know how to help, stop complaining and help.
Then again, tats has a point too. The people currently in power haven't done a whole lot, as far as the public can see, to help out the situation.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 12:07:43 GMT -5
Post by tatsi on Mar 8, 2009 12:07:43 GMT -5
Well gladius, i dont have the ability to really help them, i have a life, i have a REAL job, not to mention other things to take care of. BUT, i have tried giving my ideas, the ideas that people would actually like to see done, but because thor doesnt like me and he thinks what hes doing is right (which is not) that those ideas were never used or anything.
So yes glad, i will sit here complaining until what i say is proven right, and like every other dev admin or lat admin in the past has done, watch them wither away until the point that they cant take it anymore comes, and they quit and leave classic to poo...again.
You all have hope in thor or some poo, but hes just another prick, hes always been a prick, gamecube days and all, so yea, you'll be happy to know Dev team really has no idea what they want to do to save classic, they just have lame lil ideas to put out like chat boxes and stupid events, and a wannabe, crappier version of the trading card game which has been in works for what, a year now? If we cant get a simple card game out there before a year, what makes you all think classic is going anywhere? are you all that hard headed? I know some of you are but not all of you!
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 12:20:11 GMT -5
Post by gladius on Mar 8, 2009 12:20:11 GMT -5
All valid points.
Though the card game was on hold for a while because the main man behind it, DC, was gone.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 12:27:07 GMT -5
Post by Thor on Mar 8, 2009 12:27:07 GMT -5
Well gladius, i dont have the ability to really help them, i have a life, i have a REAL job, not to mention other things to take care of. BUT, i have tried giving my ideas, the ideas that people would actually like to see done, but because thor doesnt like me and he thinks what hes doing is right (which is not) that those ideas were never used or anything. So yes glad, i will sit here complaining until what i say is proven right, and like every other dev admin or lat admin in the past has done, watch them wither away until the point that they cant take it anymore comes, and they quit and leave classic to poo...again. You all have hope in thor or some poo, but hes just another prick, hes always been a prick, gamecube days and all, so yea, you'll be happy to know Dev team really has no idea what they want to do to save classic, they just have lame lil ideas to put out like chat boxes and stupid events, and a wannabe, crappier version of the trading card game which has been in works for what, a year now? If we cant get a simple card game out there before a year, what makes you all think classic is going anywhere? are you all that hard headed? I know some of you are but not all of you! Just as i thought, Tatsumi hasn't expressed any knowledge of HD creation, as far as waw goes, it's not an attempt to save the server, but a neat resurrected event that was supposed to be completed ages ago but forgotten about, it should provide some enjoyment for a time, perhaps with a public version made and implemented into a new area we're making for the purpose of GC/Gaming related stuff it would effect more players and perhaps get more joining events. Regardless, no one thing is going to save the server, and the many things it would require cannot realistically be done at all at once, and in a short amount of time, it seems to me that while we focus on one type of content, people will complain about the lack of progress with another type, and while we focus on that other type other people will complain about the lack of progress towards yet another type if not the original, but in your case, you will unconstructively cry a river no matter what gets done, and that's why i honestly don't give 2 poos what you think, no matter how old you are , how many hours you have, or how many years you claim to have been FAQ admin, you would probably rather see the server fail than succeed just so you can continue bugging those who sacrifice their time on top of real life activities in order to help it.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 13:44:30 GMT -5
Post by gladius on Mar 8, 2009 13:44:30 GMT -5
Also valid points.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 13:49:07 GMT -5
Post by MysticX2X on Mar 8, 2009 13:49:07 GMT -5
My name is Gladius, I like to blow everyone off.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 8, 2009 14:11:37 GMT -5
Post by gladius on Mar 8, 2009 14:11:37 GMT -5
No, your graal name is Mystic.
|
|
|
Post by tatsi on Mar 9, 2009 5:05:43 GMT -5
Warlocks vs Wizards, something that had been forgotten? Oh how typical! Everything gets forgotten on graal, as will all of this crap that you guys have been spitting out, will be forgotten.
Stop with all the talk about HD and such thor, you are talking as if the players are lab rats and you are just testing poo. You know full well i dont want to see classic fail and i fkn told you that before, i want to see you fail so i can laugh at your face for not listening you cocky asshole, you are just as arrogant and a prick as hell raven was, and looked what happend when he was admin, a pooty UN wannabe server. Now its your turn to **** up, the chat box is a great start though, really not innovative or impressive at all.
And i dont have to know anything about the HD you made, to know it sucked, and it lessened the game expierence by alot. Hello, im a game faqs reviwer here, think i cant do this poo for graal? Thor get the hell over yourself real quick buddy before you put us into an even deeper hole in the ground.
Stop with the fruity chat boxes, stop with the stupid update poo you claim to be doing, enough with the crappy HDs.
Everyone better fkn agree if they like graal, that its a goddamn adventure game and thats what its meant to be, and you are trying to make it far from that, you arent being new, you arent being creative once so ever, maybe you should be forgotten? Give us adventure, dont give us chat boxes.
...prick.
|
|
|
Post by MysticX2X on Mar 9, 2009 8:18:13 GMT -5
Adventure only came with a community. There is barely any community now due to the absurd changes by Graal management, which is out of our reach, so there can't simply be much adventure. That's how every server used to roll.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 10:03:39 GMT -5
Post by Rufus on Mar 9, 2009 10:03:39 GMT -5
Adventure only came with a community. There is barely any community now due to the absurd changes by Graal management, which is out of our reach, so there can't simply be much adventure. That's how every server used to roll. What about adventure in non-MMORPG games? Those games don't have in-game communities, but they sure as hell have a sense of adventure.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 10:41:22 GMT -5
Post by MysticX2X on Mar 9, 2009 10:41:22 GMT -5
One that surely doesn't last long enough.
Please find a willing dev team to make an intriguing story plot and then plan everything accordingly with dungeon and bosses rofl. Sardons and Gnome quest took long enough. I'm just saying it's not possible to get players around the overworld for long, especially one too big for today's playercount. It's like N-pulse - wasted space.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 10:44:21 GMT -5
Post by Rufus on Mar 9, 2009 10:44:21 GMT -5
One that surely doesn't last long enough. Please find a willing dev team to make an intriguing story plot and then plan everything accordingly with dungeon and bosses rofl. Sardons and Gnome quest took long enough. I'm just saying it's not possible to get players around the overworld for long, especially one too big for today's playercount. It's like N-pulse - wasted space. Plots act merely as a backdrop for adventure. You clearly do not understand what the concept of "adventure" in video games really consists of.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 11:22:16 GMT -5
Post by gladius on Mar 9, 2009 11:22:16 GMT -5
Adventure = going out and doing stuff in a large world with some pals, defeating numerous foes and overcoming obstacles, and having some fun along the way.
That was a spontaneous definition, so don't hold me too accountable for it.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 11:28:23 GMT -5
Post by MysticX2X on Mar 9, 2009 11:28:23 GMT -5
Being an avid fan of adventure games (Zelda for example), I think I do. Adventure games consists of exploring different parts of the map to obtain items or finish quests/missions, figuring out puzzles/mysteries, trying to defeat the main antagonist,etc. just to start off. A plot circumferences the whole game to bring it to clarity/meaning. In fact, the plot is what most Gamers even look for, so what the hell are you talking about.
But as all adventure games go, re-playability value gets lower after you finish the game. There are games like world of warcraft with no real plot as you play it most of the time, but it was created around one.
|
|
|
HD Poll
Mar 9, 2009 14:32:56 GMT -5
Post by tatsi on Mar 9, 2009 14:32:56 GMT -5
You dont need a pal to adventure.
LINK WAS ALONE! THE HERO OF TIME DID IT ALL BY HIMSELF BTW.
|
|